Home Secretary Hits Back at New York Times After Lords Reject Key Government Bills

New York Times is “Britain’s worst news agency”, says the Home Secretary, following an article published yesterday regarding the government’s latest legislative agenda.

The Home Secretary, RebaAstor, has publicly commented in response to an article published last night by the New York Times regarding recent pieces of legislation proposed by government ministers that failed to pass the House of Lords on the weekend.

In a public comment, Miss Astor called the New York Times “Britain’s worst news agency”, accusing them of sharing lies on the general news channel in the UK Discord server.

The bill referenced that has sparked the comment is the Statutory Powers Bill, proposed by the Right Honourable MP herself, which if passed, would have granted the Home Secretary sole authority to the appointment and dismissal of the heads of emergency services, being the Metropolitan Police Service, the London Fire Brigade and the London Ambulance Service.

In her comment, the Home Secretary wrote that “currently, they can be dismissed for any reason”, further adding that “the only real change in policy is that the Prime Minister no longer has a role to prevent redundancy powers in law, and now we have set reasons for dismissal rather than a free for all as the current system allows”.

The New York Times mentioned her bill and the Serious Crime Bill, proposed by Justice Secretary, jam1443, which both failed to pass vote in the Lords, when they convened for a session on Saturday evening.

Directed toward the news company itself, she shared “Maybe the Failing and Zero Credibility New York Times wouldn’t have to sell up to American NPCs if they didn’t keep printing absolute and total fake news and biased content on behalf of their political masters.”

No response has been publicly released by the New York Times since the Home Secretary’s statement.